Teams

Thompson-WatsonCCL40

2023 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-10vs Tatum 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Martha Broadbent / Karyn Shane6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-07vs Adams PVWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Allison Horton / Margie Shuffler7-5, 6-3
2023-04-25vs Glancy 40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Audrey Robbins / Sara Borcherding6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-16vs Felton/FeilerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Adair Wright / Melissa Rahe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-28vs Atterbury 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Stephanie Stevens / Angie Coats6-2, 7-5
2023-03-23vs Adams PVWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Julie Lemley / Margie Shuffler6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-21vs Glancy 40Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Genevieve Hansler / Beth Davis6-2, 6-4
2023-03-16vs Tatum 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Jodi Adams / Cheryl Lachowicz6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lisa Elsberry
published
3.92
Lee Ann Zierenberg
published
3.90
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.77
Anne Broderick
published 4
3.73
Desiree Morgan
published 4
3.58
Lisa Sottung
published
3.56
Lissi Rabon
published
3.44
Kelly Bradshaw
published
3.40
Patricia Thomson
published
Kellie Keehn
published
Lisa Arakelian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Broderick + Desiree Morgan0547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Elsberry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.12
Lee Ann Zierenberg
35W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Anne Broderick
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Desiree Morgan
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Lisa Sottung
43W–32L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lissi Rabon
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kelly Bradshaw
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
Patricia Thomson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kellie Keehn
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Arakelian
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.