Teams

Whitten/Lacy

2026 Combo Doubles 40&Over-NC · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs Miller40+ 6.5 combo 2026Won 21
W#1 DoublesDevra Hampton / Amasa Lacy vs Lori Gibbons / Rachel Heun6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Loftin / Christi Adams vs Julie Parks / Kristi Cherry6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Downs / Kim Williams vs Pam Beard / Staci Gill6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Bowling 40+ NCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDevra Hampton / Amasa Lacy vs Yongqin Zhang / Christine Ohrberg7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Henley / Suzanne Speltz vs Tammy Robertson / Kimberly Williams7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Loftin / Christi Adams vs Marin Touchstone / Tracy Hill6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Lauren Bloodworth
published
2.97
Devra Hampton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Christi Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Michele Henley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Christine Loftin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Maray McIntyre
published
2.69
Suzanne Speltz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Carie Costello
published 3
2.58
Rebecca Mitchell
published
2.56
Pam Johnson
published
2.48
Michelle Whitten
published
2.45
Tammy Downs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Johnson + Tammy Downs51243% games+3.4% vs expected
Christi Adams + Christine Loftin161452% games+1.9% vs expected
Suzanne Speltz + Michele Henley404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Whitten + Tammy Downs123 matchesnot enough data
Devra Hampton + Amasa Lacy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Bloodworth
32W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
3
Devra Hampton
31W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Christi Adams
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Michele Henley
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Christine Loftin
21W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Maray McIntyre
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Suzanne Speltz
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Carie Costello
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Rebecca Mitchell
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Pam Johnson
34W–39L career · no lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Michelle Whitten
5W–15L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Tammy Downs
27W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.