Teams

Sarasota/Dipierro/55&Over8.0W

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 8.0 W Monday

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-27vs River Strand QuirosLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Kara Beene / Hattie Grimsley7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-11-06vs Cedars Island GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Kristin Knous / Yuka Pearl6-3, 6-3
2023-10-30vs Payne Park SeiderWon 10
W#3 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Donna Hannigan / Michelle Coates6-2, 6-1
2023-10-23vs Waterford DuncanWon 10
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Mitzi Lamy / Patricia Gregory6-4, 6-3
2023-10-02vs LWR SosaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Janet Kramer vs Lu Circelli / Kathy Rain3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Maria Riccio vs Donna Dubinsky / Angela Heck6-3, 6-1
2023-09-25vs SSC DavySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Tracy Fang / Lori Madden6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Susie Lentile vs Ann Davy / Cheryl Lyn7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.62
Cynthia Horton
published 4
3.47
Lesli Andrews
published
Janet Kramer
published
Maria Riccio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cynthia Horton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Lesli Andrews
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.