Teams

RCC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs LTA-Q GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesMary Gritzmacher / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Emma West / Erika Cistone6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Lindsay Roland6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Ann Marie White vs Krystal Thomas / Rhonda Dudley6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Valentina Satanassi2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBridgette Gilmer / Danielle Witte vs Melissa Karch / Amy Kirtland6-7, 5-7
2025-05-19vs BTA-IBM YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesRilla Baca / SARA CONWAY vs Monica Mortenson / Kelly Ruybal2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Audrey Huse7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Gritzmacher / Chrissy Hasek vs Jo Ann Johnson / Lori Moehn6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBridgette Gilmer / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Cheryl McBay / Emily Koechel5-7, 5-7
2025-05-12vs MEA YELLOWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Mary Gritzmacher vs Ann Roth / Susan Boennighausen7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Cynthia Shick4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrenna Hermes / Morgan Ernzen vs Annabel Stelling / Marianne Martin3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Marie White / Jennifer Flaherty vs Nicole Duster / Devan Haas6-4, 6-2
2025-05-05vs BCC YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesSARA CONWAY / Ann Marie White vs Jori Whitling / Amy Gilbride6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Gritzmacher vs Nadine Rich6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrenna Hermes / Morgan Ernzen vs Brandi Lipton / Monica Desmoulins1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRilla Baca vs Jane Mcdonald4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Odegaard / Kirsten Coppo vs Kelly Spehar / Lisabeth Warshafsky4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-28vs LAC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesMaggie Cox / SARA CONWAY vs Mary Ellen Speights / Kelly Parker6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Jennifer Sardinia6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Morgan Ernzen vs Amy Grolnick / Kristi Mark7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDanielle Witte / Mary Gritzmacher vs MARY WEISFOUT / Catherine Capparelli6-3, 6-3
2025-04-21vs RMTC BLACKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSARA CONWAY / Maggie Cox vs Amy Chan / Brooke Staton6-4, 2-5
W#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Tamny Costello6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrenna Hermes / Morgan Ernzen vs Robin Noble / Carol Hoeffler2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Danielle Witte vs Justine Allison / Zoe Vandeveer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-14vs CVTA ORANGEWon 50
W#1 DoublesMaggie Cox - * / Mary Gritzmacher vs Liz Olynyk / Michaela Masciarelli1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Cristina Torres-Machi6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie White / Kirsten Coppo vs Joyce Kennedy Raymes / Dianna Benavidez6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSARA CONWAY vs Hanna Whirty7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Bridgette Gilmer vs Julia Garza / Kelly McDevitt7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Mary Gritzmacher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Kristen Hamill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Morgan Ernzen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
SARA CONWAY
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.70
Brenna Hermes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Kirsten Coppo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Odegaard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Ann Marie White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Danielle Witte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Ernzen + Brenna Hermes3642% games−9.8% vs expected
Kirsten Coppo + Chrissy Hasek2344% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Coppo + Ann Marie White134 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Hamill + Danielle Witte033 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Witte + Elizabeth Odegaard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Gritzmacher
53W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kristen Hamill
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Morgan Ernzen
38W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
SARA CONWAY
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Brenna Hermes
34W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Kirsten Coppo
48W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Odegaard
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Ann Marie White
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Danielle Witte
54W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.