Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Stephanie

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-18vs OC Yorba Linda - ClaudiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Gabrielle Hansen vs Malia Lewis / Monica Kirby6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-10vs OC MVTC - GeeLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Colson / Sophie Sanchez vs Dana Buckley / Laura Schlom1-6, 3-6
2022-11-04vs OC Eldorado TC - LisaWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Darcy Kendrick vs Lisa Lauriano / Kristine Hammond6-2, 6-4
2022-10-28vs OC The Huntington Club - JoWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Gabrielle Hansen vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Samantha Bloom6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-10-21vs OC Dana Hills TC - Cris 10amWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Jaime Blandford vs Rhonda Glasscock / Mandi Peo6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Sophie Sanchez vs Nicole Doan / Karla Padova6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-16vs OC Mesa Verde CC - JulieWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Gabrielle Hansen vs Cindy Galitski / Linda Marcopulos6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Gabrielle Hansen
published 4
3.64
Ladawn Stone
published
3.39
Samantha Ackad
published
3.37
Barbara Springer
published 3.5
3.32
Linda LaRue
published
3.30
Stephanie Colson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Jaime Blandford
published 3.5
Elizabeth Harris
published 3.5
3.21
Sophie Sanchez
published
3.20
Darcy Kendrick
published 3.5
Jeanine Bast
published
Susan Hoffnagle
published
Traci Streets
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gabrielle Hansen
16W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Ladawn Stone
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Springer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Linda LaRue
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Jaime Blandford
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Harris
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sophie Sanchez
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Darcy Kendrick
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jeanine Bast
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Hoffnagle
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Traci Streets
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.