Teams

Ace Team

2023 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.78 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-28vs BaselinersWon 20
W#1 SinglesZoie Acadia vs Debra MacDonald6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAnto Faini vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Jilan Chen6-2, 7-5
2023-08-17vs New HomiesWon 21
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Yulan Jin6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesZoie Acadia vs Frances Brennan6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Penelope Bell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-13vs BaselinersWon 10
W#3 SinglesNa Yi vs Robin Rudowitz6-1, 6-0
2023-08-08vs Cosmic Strings SWon 10
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Katya Vert-Wong6-3, 5-2
2023-08-03vs New HomiesLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Penelope Bell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-24vs BaselinersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnto Faini vs Gloria McDowell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesNa Yi vs Tamar Henkin6-3, 6-3
2023-07-10vs New HomiesWon 30
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Millette Miller6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Yulan Jin6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesZoie Acadia vs Carmen Scurato6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.65
Zoie Acadia
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Anto Faini
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.53
Na Yi
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.20
3.18
Carina Villagra
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Jelena Mitrovic314 matchesnot enough data
Kelsey Forbes + Anto Faini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Anto Faini
227W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
4
Na Yi
198W–103L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.