Teams

Ivory Ridge-Broadbent

2022 Winter League-Weekday · 2.5W AM

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-21vs Riverside Tennis-VASALost 02
L#1 SinglesMikaela Bills vs Jana Okey1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKylie Bischof / Aubrey Smith vs Jennifer Brotherson / Nancy Holman3-6, 1-6
2022-03-14vs Sunpro-AllenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAubrey Smith / Kylie Bischof vs Emily Lillywhite / Elizabeth Cohen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Riley / Mikaela Bills vs Emily Mills / Jamie Crews5-7, 1-3
2022-02-14Split 11
W#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Mikaela Bills vs Staci Larsen / Amy Larsen6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKylie Bischof vs Kate Dickman0-6, 0-6
2022-02-07vs Riverside Tennis-VASALost 01
L#2 DoublesKelsie Johnson / Aubrey Smith vs Sherrie Hill / Corinne Wudel2-6, 0-6
2022-01-31vs Sunpro-AllenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMikaela Bills / Tiffany Riley vs Emily Lillywhite / Holly Ricker6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAubrey Smith vs Ashlee Chappell0-6, 1-6
2022-01-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesMikaela Bills vs Naomi Stroud-Peterson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Tiffany Riley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.97
Kyoko Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.55
Jill Broadbent
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Aubrey Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Kylie Bischof
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Mikaela Bills
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kylie Bischof + Aubrey Smith2441% games+6.5% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Kyoko Jensen2449% games+3.7% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Mikaela Bills6752% games−5.0% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Tiffany Riley6847% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Riley
102W–91L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3
Kyoko Jensen
102W–119L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jill Broadbent
68W–93L career · 12 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Aubrey Smith
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kylie Bischof
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mikaela Bills
20W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.