Teams

TNT Combo 6.5

2023 Fredericksburg Combo · Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Judith Jobrack vs Lori Huthoefer / Leslie Mcdonald6-4, 6-1
2023-09-15vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Judith Jobrack vs Telly Salafia / Terry Sumner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-31vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Judith Jobrack vs Theresa Dressler / Linda Catullo6-1, 6-1
2023-08-28vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesDorota Sipko / Tracey Nankivel vs Lorrie Roberts / Terry Sumner7-6, 6-3
2023-08-26vs Battlefield Ball Busters Combo 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Tracey Nankivel vs Melissa Hutcheson / Kathryn Davis6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hazard / Judith Jobrack vs Alice Meyers-Paulin / Jamie Mcneill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-19vs Tiebreakers Combo 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Tracey Nankivel vs Rachel Wadkins / Sandra Gillenwater6-0, 6-1
2023-07-30vs Battlefield Ball Busters Combo 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Jean Calloway vs Lori Huthoefer / Kathryn Davis6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Alpert
published
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
2.73
Judith Jobrack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Jennifer Isham
published
K VICTORY
published
Lisa Bartley
published
Rachael Day
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Jones + Sabra Szczyglowski4265% games+11.1% vs expected
Judith Jobrack + Dorota Sipko303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Lisa Alpert
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Isham
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
K VICTORY
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Bartley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.