Teams

Hutch BBTC 40 and Over

2026 Adult 40 & Over-GC · Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-05vs DH-ThompsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Ladnier / Ryan Canon vs Donald Geier / Rock Rowell6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJohnny Hisaw vs Sheldon Zhang0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRenaldo Jordan / William Hasty vs Cultus Pearson / Peter Yednorowicz6-2, 6-1
2026-04-14vs Levy - Martin/WilkinsonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRenaldo Jordan / Dan Adams vs Anthony Nguyen / Jeff LeBlanc1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJohnny Hisaw vs Johnny Still6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDana Ladnier / Todd Bradford vs Wes Steiner / Jeremy Tapper6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Descher / William Hasty vs Wade Hardy / Bryan Hall5-7, 0-6
2026-03-02vs Levy - Martin/WilkinsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesRyan Canon / Dana Ladnier vs Jason Brannon / Wade Hardy4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRenaldo Jordan vs Johnny Still6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Descher / James Merritt vs Jeremy Tapper / Wes Steiner3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Bradford / Johnny Hisaw vs David Ryan / Kenny Sands6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Levy - Martin/Wilkinson5015513152
2Hutch BBTC 40 and Over035715115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Johnny Hisaw
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Dana Ladnier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Ryan Canon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Renaldo Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.57
Jeff Descher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
James Merritt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
William Hasty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Dan Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Todd Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shane Hutchinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renaldo Jordan + Dan Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Hisaw
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Dana Ladnier
27W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Ryan Canon
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Renaldo Jordan
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeff Descher
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
James Merritt
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
William Hasty
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Dan Adams
22W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Todd Bradford
29W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Shane Hutchinson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.