← Teams

CGM-Watson/Rakoz

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Cinthia Erickson
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
2.97
Cyndi Johnson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Tomoko Langworthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-05-16Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Jill Watson vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Parks / Tomoko Langworthy vs Nicola Ash / Anna Myers6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Ericka Nelson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Jill Watson vs Kalynn Belden / Jennifer Johnson6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Parish Burns6-4, 2-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Kaufman / Cyndi Johnson vs Kathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi6-0, 6-0
2021-05-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTomoko Langworthy / Tamara Phillips vs Jennifer Fei / Wanda Ng7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Jing Feng2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-25Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Christina Melander6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCyndi Johnson vs Shannon Davis6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTamee Baffaro / Tomoko Langworthy vs Pamela Meyer / Pearl Lee6-1, 6-1
2021-04-11Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Andrea Lamprecht5-7, 5-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi Palena / Tomoko Langworthy vs Laura Walker / Dorothy Cofield6-4, 6-4
2021-03-21Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDelena Palena / Tamara Phillips vs Angie Stromquist / Cate Harrington - (DQ)*6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Inge Marshall6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Cinthia Erickson
37W–32L career
4%96%0%
3.17
3
Cyndi Johnson
39W–22L career
0%84%16%
2.97
3
Tomoko Langworthy
50W–68L career
7%93%0%
2.65
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.