Teams

Lost Creek Strikers

Winter Adult 40 & Over WeekEND · Mens 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-05vs Smart Aces 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJP Jordan / Jeff Kalikstein vs Michael Kavcak / Robert Alexander6-4, 6-2
2023-02-19vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#1 DoublesAsad Sawani / JP Jordan vs Prentiss Hall / Hayden Colby6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-02-05vs Swing IT 40&overLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Totah / JP Jordan vs TROY MADRES / Richard White1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-04vs Polo Club 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJP Jordan / Michael Totah vs John Waldner / Mitch Reid6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-15vs Westwood 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJP Jordan / Michael Totah vs Joe Newberry / Ryan Tierney5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Asad Sawani
published 4
Aaron Price
published 4
3.69
JP Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.61
Jeff Kalikstein
published
3.36
Chris Moose
published 3.5
3.31
Eric Webber
published 3.5
3.26
Matt Kuhles
published
Erik Qualman
published 3.5
3.23
Michael Totah
published
3.22
Ryan South
published
3.17
Jonathan Beal
published
3.06
Mark Thatcher
published
2.78
Blair Duncan
published 3
David Cox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Asad Sawani + Aaron Price6083% games+27.5% vs expected
Michael Totah + JP Jordan17460% games+7.9% vs expected
Michael Totah + Eric Webber5154% games+1.9% vs expected
Eric Webber + Ryan South91746% games−2.9% vs expected
Mark Thatcher + Chris Moose2746% games−8.8% vs expected
Jeff Kalikstein + Chris Moose4250% gamesnot enough data
Eric Webber + Chris Moose2355% gamesnot enough data
Eric Webber + Jonathan Beal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Asad Sawani
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Aaron Price
67W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
JP Jordan
124W–67L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Jeff Kalikstein
46W–51L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Moose
55W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Eric Webber
46W–49L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Matt Kuhles
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Erik Qualman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Totah
49W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Ryan South
47W–54L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jonathan Beal
25W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Mark Thatcher
15W–26L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Blair Duncan
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
David Cox
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.