Teams

YMCA:Howell:Radke

2022 NH Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-04-10vs EXE:Maye:McGuireLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Nobert / Christian Rowland vs Michelle Braasch / Jeremy Fine6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Driscoll / Philip Keller vs Christine Tatro / Timothy Hannan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Czerw / Matthew Grote vs Melissa Lawless / Craig Beckman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-20vs EXE:Maye:McGuireLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Bossi / Philip Keller vs Christopher Girasole / Jennifer Girasole5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Driscoll / Christian Rowland vs Chris Maye / Hillary Maye6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Radke / Matthew Grote vs Craig Beckman / Ann Dahlen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Rajesh Manoharan
published
3.33
Christian Rowland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Susan Bossi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Joseph Proulx
published
3.28
Meghan Howell
published
3.26
Nicole Driscoll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Denise Nobert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Philip Keller
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Laura Czerw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Penney
published
Lori Radke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Grote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Proulx + Denise Nobert4160% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bossi + Joseph Proulx314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Keller + Lori Radke134 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Proulx + Lori Radke314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Keller + Denise Nobert033 matchesnot enough data
Christian Rowland + Lori Radke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rajesh Manoharan
48W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Christian Rowland
25W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Susan Bossi
131W–78L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Joseph Proulx
63W–46L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Meghan Howell
105W–62L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Nicole Driscoll
71W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Denise Nobert
87W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Philip Keller
25W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Laura Czerw
72W–80L career · 1 line in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Linda Penney
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Radke
41W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Grote
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.