Teams

Riley/Elkins/FAC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-21vs Puryear-Lux/Fayetteville/FACLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Murray / Tiffany Harris vs Karen Young / Natalie Kaderly2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJena Newman / Melissa King vs Cameron Mullins / Brandy Long2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNora Cooper / Cathy Knight vs Molly Puryear / Holly Roblee3-6, 2-6
2026-07-20vs Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLyndsey Weber / Anindhitha Sudhakaran vs Nellie Beall / Anna Scott Chesshir6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenna Donnell / Melissa King vs Liz Krauft / Kristen Rolle6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmber Anderson / Nora Cooper vs Karen Nelson / Tania Brewer6-1, 7-5
2026-07-11vs Kushmaul-Kurin/Rogers/MRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffany Harris / Lyndsey Weber vs Hattie Kurin / Maya Kushmaul1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa King / Jena Newman vs Wen Su / Rebecca Roden6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Knight / Kathryn Panek vs Yaping Zhu / Marta Liberti-morrison6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-29vs Trout/Bentonville/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnindhitha Sudhakaran / Susan Murray vs Caroline Soerensen / Julia Coffman0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Donnell / Jena Newman vs Andrea Trout / Maria Pearson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNora Cooper / Cathy Knight vs Courtney Baird / Audra Peterson6-2, 6-2
2026-06-26vs Stroup/Lowell/MRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bright / Tiffany Harris vs Rossitza Hristoskova / JANET BLUMENTHAL6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNastassja Riley / Aysa Galbraith vs Haily Jones / Gail Stroup6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathryn Panek / Nora Cooper vs Jessica Carter / Cassie Ross6-1, 6-1
2026-06-23vs Mejia/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bright / Anindhitha Sudhakaran vs Helen Peng / ZOHARA MORALLI6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa King / Jenna Donnell vs Angela Palladino / Alisha Rohlwing6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmber Anderson / Cathy Knight vs Brittany Lederer / Sofie Coleman6-4, 7-5
2026-06-16vs Chrisman-Schutz/Springdale/SRCWon 20
W#2 DoublesNastassja Riley / Aysa Galbraith vs Shannon Hendrix / Tia Greaser7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCathy Knight / Kathryn Panek vs Kelsey Lewis / Andi Douglas6-3, 6-2
2025-10-01vs Trout/Bentonville/KTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenna Donnell / Michele Senlikci vs Rebecca Bell / Julia Coffman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNastassja Riley / Deann Richmond vs Carrie Beere / Melissa Campana6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJena Newman / Carol Harris vs Ashley Crouch / Angela Paulk5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-17vs Trout/Bentonville/KTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesNastassja Riley / Laura Kryzanowsky vs Aimee Duca / Andrea Trout6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenna Donnell / Robin Wise vs Carrie Beere / Melissa Campana6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sarah Bright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Tiffany Harris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Anindhitha Sudhakaran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Jenna Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.81
Aysa Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Nastassja Riley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Jena Newman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.50
Nora Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Kathryn Panek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Cathy Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Scarlet Yang
published
Lyndsey Weber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nastassja Riley + Aysa Galbraith5160% games+4.0% vs expected
Anindhitha Sudhakaran + Sarah Bright213 matchesnot enough data
Jena Newman + Jenna Donnell033 matchesnot enough data
Nastassja Riley + Sarah Bright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bright
41W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
Tiffany Harris
38W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anindhitha Sudhakaran
2W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jenna Donnell
46W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Aysa Galbraith
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Nastassja Riley
26W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Jena Newman
16W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Nora Cooper
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.50
Kathryn Panek
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
2.5
Cathy Knight
22W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Scarlet Yang
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Lyndsey Weber
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.