Teams

Aceholes

Mixed 40 & Over - Fall · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-14vs UMLY United 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Tracey / Jason Friel vs Markus Edstrom / Kathy Steinway1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBill Keaton / Gena Maresca vs Quang Nguyen / Annica Edstrom4-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs UMLY United 8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Tracey / Jason Friel vs Min Lubiniecki / Andy Chung2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGena Maresca / Bill Keaton vs Craig Miller / Helena Malarkey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brown / Nino Scalamandre vs Kathy Steinway / Christopher Jones2-6, 2-6
2021-09-26vs Penn PoachersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoseph Busby / Deborah Brown vs Dietrich Chen / Lynn Selhat4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarlos Araujo / Hilary Noden vs Jill Cohen / Ben Hurtig6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnn Tracey / Jason Friel vs Oliver Yu / Sonya Lee6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Ann Tracey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Hilary Noden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Nino Scalamandre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Gena Maresca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Carlos Araujo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jason Friel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Bill Keaton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Joseph Busby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Araujo + Ann Tracey7260% games+2.0% vs expected
Ann Tracey + Jason Friel32037% games−7.6% vs expected
Gena Maresca + Carlos Araujo1443% gamesnot enough data
Gena Maresca + Bill Keaton044 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Araujo + Hilary Noden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Tracey
310W–221L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Hilary Noden
94W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Nino Scalamandre
71W–78L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
4
Gena Maresca
61W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Carlos Araujo
138W–138L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Jason Friel
105W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bill Keaton
89W–106L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Joseph Busby
45W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.