Teams

CDTA W M18&OX10.0 3.Lake Bluff Pacaut Sun 6 $22

CDTA Winter Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA Mixed 18 & Over 10.0 Winter

16 players · average NTRP 4.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesAlice Pacaut / Jeffrey Rutherford vs Cynthya Goulet / Joe Gasior6-7, 5-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Shields / Daria Rakitskaya vs Brittany Ballog / Paul Gilden6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlice Pacaut / Herman Abban vs Max Crouse / Sarah Monteagudo6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesMegan Nguyen / Jeffrey Rutherford vs Sarah Monteagudo / Max Crouse7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesIan Barr / Daria Rakitskaya vs Claire Buehler / Alex Yan4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · CDTA Mixed 18 & Over 10.0 Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W M18&OX10.0 3.Lake Bluff Pacaut Sun 6 $226115615142
2CDTA W M18&OX10.0 2.Lakeshore Natarajan Sat 5 $262471122159
3CDTA W M18&OX10.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 4 $222581326183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.98
Alice Pacaut
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 5
Alex Donkor
published 5
4.36
Brandon Wozniczka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.32
Megan Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.31
Randi Wind
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Bruce Harris
published 4.5
4.17
Ian Barr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.05
Jean Michel Dos Remedios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daria Rakitskaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriela Bobrowski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Herman Abban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jake Goodman
published
Jake Quigley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jeffrey Rutherford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Shields
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Valeria Stoilova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Wozniczka + Randi Wind4353% gamesnot enough data
Jake Quigley + Gabriela Bobrowski6169% gamesnot enough data
Herman Abban + Alice Pacaut404 matchesnot enough data
Megan Nguyen + Peter Shields303 matchesnot enough data
Peter Shields + Gabriela Bobrowski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alice Pacaut
143W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.98
5
Alex Donkor
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Brandon Wozniczka
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.36
Megan Nguyen
100W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.32
Randi Wind
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Bruce Harris
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ian Barr
41W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Jean Michel Dos Remedios
62W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Daria Rakitskaya
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriela Bobrowski
18W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Herman Abban
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jake Goodman
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jake Quigley
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Rutherford
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Shields
121W–52L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Stoilova
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.