Teams

Bray/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-18vs Mortimer/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesAngela McFall / Mary Dalto vs Jenny Webster / Kerry Johnson7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDana Bray vs Frances Lawhead2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Lina Yi vs Caroline Delpriore / Molly Sweet4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHala Hakim vs Caroline Smith6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Julie Moultrie vs Molly Coyne / Kristi Rice2-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs Leavell/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesAngela McFall / Mary Dalto vs Elizabeth Lewis / Neely Leavell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Lee Leavell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Heather Andersen vs Jennifer Sammons / Hattie Rounder6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDana Bray vs Mary Maxwell6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLee Anne Futrell / Paige Lonergan vs Samantha Douglas / Rebekah Tashie4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-26vs Mccalla/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesMary Dalto / Angela McFall vs Shannon McCalla / Elizabeth Csernovicz6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDana Bray vs Kathy Lee6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Julie Moultrie vs Emily Brown / Jenni Orahood6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLina Yi vs Virginia Lang6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHala Hakim / Patricia Dewey vs Meredith Haselwood / Angie Deupree6-7, 6-7
2024-10-21vs Mortimer/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / Cher Berberich vs Molly Coyne / Kristi Rice2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Moultrie vs Frances Lawhead0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / Angela McFall vs ANITA ARBELAEZ / Kerry Johnson6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesHala Hakim vs Caroline Smith6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Lina Yi vs Carley Myrick / Jenny Webster7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-08vs Leavell/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesAngela McFall / Mary Dalto vs Samantha Douglas / Lee Leavell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary Johnston Tayloe vs Mary Maxwell6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Lina Yi vs Elizabeth Lewis / Elizabeth Bennett6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDana Bray vs Alison Rice6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCher Berberich / Lee Anne Futrell vs Rebekah Tashie / Hattie Rounder6-4, 6-1
2024-10-05vs Echols/TennesseeWon 50
W#1 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / Mary Dalto vs Betsy Ferguson / Lynn Davis6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMary Johnston Tayloe vs Emily Gallops6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Lina Yi vs Andrea Henry / Ally Boggan6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDana Bray vs Stacey Hyde6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShelley Richter / Paige Lonergan vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Darlene Loprete6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Mary Johnston Tayloe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Angela McFall
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Mary Dalto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Dana Bray
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.20
Wang-Ying Glasgow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.09
Lina Yi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.09
Cher Berberich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Hala Hakim
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Patricia Dewey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Stephanie Longsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Julie Moultrie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.88
Elizabeth Garrott
published
3.88
Shelley Richter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Paige Lonergan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lee Anne Futrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Yi + Wang-Ying Glasgow7753% games+0.3% vs expected
Angela McFall + Mary Dalto404 matchesnot enough data
Hala Hakim + Patricia Dewey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Johnston Tayloe
28W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Angela McFall
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Dalto
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Dana Bray
25W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Wang-Ying Glasgow
24W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Lina Yi
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Cher Berberich
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Hala Hakim
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Patricia Dewey
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Stephanie Longsworth
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Julie Moultrie
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.90
Elizabeth Garrott
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Shelley Richter
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Paige Lonergan
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Heather Andersen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lee Anne Futrell
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.