Teams

1-GMatera-HR

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-26vs 2-SNarayan-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatt Piland / Eddie Blount vs Scott Benson / Michael Meltsner2-6, 1-6
2023-08-10vs 2-SNarayan-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / William Lillard vs Dan Clemson / Ty Bullard4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
David Slack
published 4.5
4.13
Erik J Erikson
published
4.08
Jeffrey Clough
published
4.06
Matt Piland
published
4.01
Kyle Couch
published
3.78
Edward Anderson
published
3.69
Nate Brown
published
3.65
Eddie Blount
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
William Lillard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Labow
published
Greg Matera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Slack
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
Jeffrey Clough
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
4.08
Matt Piland
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Kyle Couch
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
Edward Anderson
19W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Nate Brown
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Eddie Blount
41W–44L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
William Lillard
50W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
Eric Labow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Greg Matera
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.