Teams

Henderson/Reda(DAY)

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 65 & OVER · 3.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-06vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATESplit 11
W#1 DoublesClaudia Barnett / Sandra Morgan vs Patricia Lerch / Joan Willey6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNadine Norton / Kathy Reidway vs Suzanne McDade / Dee Schmid1-6, 5-7
2025-04-03vs SHUMWAY CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Burke / Sandra Morgan vs Kathleen Kear / Sandra Babyak2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJean Toner / Pam McGorry vs Gloria Lepari / Deb Yackley7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTina Bald / Debra Henderson vs Christine Rogers / Donna Kuhn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-25vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATEWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam McGorry / Kathy Reidway vs Liz Gustin / Lisa Seifert7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNadine Norton / Connie Neuner vs Dee Schmid / Irene Hathaway7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEllena Reda / Sandra Morgan vs Gloria Miller / LINDA DEFONTES6-1, 6-1
2025-03-18vs SHUMWAY CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Barnett / Jean Cohen vs Caryl Mayo / Gloria Lepari6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEllena Reda / Cheryl Manger vs Gayle Fulks / Sandra Babyak3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Reidway / Carolyn Power vs Pamela Boswell / Christine Rogers1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-07vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Burke / Tina Bald vs Debbie Beal / Liz Gustin2-0
W#2 DoublesEllena Reda / Cheryl Manger vs Lisa Seifert / Joan Willey6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPam McGorry / Nadine Norton vs GRACE FULGHAM / Suzanne McDade7-5, 7-5
2025-02-27vs SHUMWAY CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesJean Cohen / Claudia Barnett vs Kathleen Kear / Donna Kuhn6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSandra Morgan / Carolyn Power vs Bernice Burch / Gloria Lepari6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPam McGorry / Connie Neuner vs Gayle Fulks / Deb Yackley6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Debra Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Pam McGorry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Claudia Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Connie Neuner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cheryl Manger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Carolyn Power
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Ellena Reda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Kathy Reidway
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jean Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Toner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nadine Norton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tina Bald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Neuner + Pam McGorry4159% games+6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Henderson
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Pam McGorry
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Claudia Barnett
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Connie Neuner
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cheryl Manger
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carolyn Power
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Ellena Reda
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kathy Reidway
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Jean Cohen
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Toner
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nadine Norton
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Morgan
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Bald
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.