Teams

Fawn Lake Catullo

2025 Fredericksburg Singles · Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsWon 21
W#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Sabra Szczyglowski6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Franklin vs Hannah Cramer6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesEmily Ochsenknecht vs Beth Sanford6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-11vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsWon 21
W#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Sabra Szczyglowski7-5, 6-0
L#2 SinglesEmily Ochsenknecht vs Tara Ford5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Isham vs Beth Sanford6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 12
W#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Amanda Jamero3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaren Franklin vs Tara Ford4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLaurel Thoreson vs Beth Sanford2-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 12
L#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Amanda Jamero6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Franklin vs Tara Ford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRobin Long vs Hannah Cramer6-2, 6-2
2025-09-06vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsWon 21
W#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Nicole Fassnacht6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Ochsenknecht vs Beth Sanford6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJennifer Isham vs Katie DeWald2-6, 0-6
2025-08-30vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 02
L#1 SinglesEmily Ochsenknecht vs Nicole Fassnacht7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRobin Long vs Tara Ford2-6, 1-6
2025-08-23vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsWon 21
W#1 SinglesErika Subkanha vs Amanda Jamero7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLinda Catullo vs Tara Ford1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Isham vs Katie DeWald7-6, 6-3
2025-08-20vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaren Franklin vs Sabra Szczyglowski2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLinda Catullo vs Hannah Cramer6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesLaurel Thoreson vs Mary Blake1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erika Subkanha
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Robin Long
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Emily Ochsenknecht
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Karen Franklin
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.71
Jennifer Isham
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.62
Linda Catullo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.43
Laurel Thoreson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Subkanha
5W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Long
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Emily Ochsenknecht
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Karen Franklin
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Jennifer Isham
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Linda Catullo
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Laurel Thoreson
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.