Teams

Bethel/ Thornton 65s 7.5 Combo W Thursday AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 7.5 Women 65+ Thurs AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-09vs Atchison 65s 7.5 Combo W Thurs AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatty Dutton / Sallye Parker vs Judy Eaton / Ann Evans1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Tarver / Nancy McCoy vs Theresa Atchison / Mary Jean Nelson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVicky Bethel / Keevie Martin vs Shelby Rhyne / Lynda Pegram1-6, 2-6
2025-10-07vs Atchison 65s 7.5 Combo W Thurs AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Jane Tarver / Jean Schmid vs Judy Eaton / Ann Evans3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJody Susong / Janis Beshears vs Nancy McNeill / Lynda Pegram0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVicky Bethel / Patty Dutton vs Janet Fortney / Mary Jean Nelson1-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Atchison 65s 7.5 Combo W Thurs AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Thornton / Sallye Parker vs Shelby Rhyne / Dell Barbee2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanis Beshears / Mary Fowler vs Judy Eaton / Minerva Loran5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Moss / Jean Schmid vs Nancy McNeill / Ann Evans3-6, 2-6
2025-08-21vs Atchison 65s 7.5 Combo W Thurs AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Nixon / Jean Schmid vs Lynn Tester / Mary Jean Nelson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Fowler / Jody Susong vs Dell Barbee / Theresa Atchison5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVicky Bethel / Kristen Moss vs Lynn Chafin / Susan Payne6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 65+ Thurs AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Keevie Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Mary Jane Tarver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Mary Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Gwenda Priest
published
3.36
Jean Schmid
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Kristen Moss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mary Ann Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Vicky Bethel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Patty Dutton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Anne Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Jody Susong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Janis Beshears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Nancy McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Bethel + Jean Schmid3447% games−7.7% vs expected
Mary Fowler + Mary Ann Nixon1638% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Sallye Parker2546% gamesnot enough data
Janis Beshears + Jody Susong2344% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Bethel + Mary Fowler033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Jody Susong123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Nixon + Gwenda Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Janis Beshears033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Mary Jane Tarver
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Mary Fowler
67W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jean Schmid
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Kristen Moss
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Vicky Bethel
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29
Patty Dutton
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Anne Thornton
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jody Susong
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Janis Beshears
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Nancy McCoy
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.