← Teams

PTC-Lee/Sleight

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.29 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
—
Lyudmila Leissler
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #2 Singles 54%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Debbie Frankel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Kimberly Stockstad
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-22Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Natalia Joelson7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHilary Johnson vs Jamie Heberlein6-1, 6-0
2019-06-15Won 4–1
W#1 DoublesJanet Lee / Rachel Novak vs Sibyl Jarrett / Debby Blank6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Casey vs Maleia Briggs6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Frankel / Kimberly Stockstad vs Gretchen Hall / Shelly Bigley7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Roberta Kanter / Mary Schwarz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2019-06-09Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesKristin Sacco / Debbie Frankel vs Sibyl Jarrett / Roberta Kanter6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Janet Lee vs Marilyn Bishop / Lisa Levenson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHilary Johnson vs Maleia Briggs6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Mary Schwarz / Denise Hogan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-06-02Won 3–2
L#1 DoublesCarla Scott / Rachel Novak vs Rebecca Harris / Diana Lavery6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Sharon Feinblatt6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Elizabeth Evans / Jacqui Slominski6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDebbie Frankel vs Megan Daniels6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Sacco / Kimberly Stockstad vs Diane Macdonald / Kathy Siebers6-4, 7-6
2019-05-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Pamela Lagielski / Patti Dybdahl3-4
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Leah Black6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Hilary Johnson vs Anna Boyarshinova / Teresa Darling6-2, 7-6
2019-05-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCarla Scott / Rachel Novak vs Itsuko Day / Kris Parmele6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesErin Casey vs Tami McAra6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSarah Larson / Hilary Johnson vs Jennifer Lucas / Nozomi Bray7-5, 6-4
2019-04-27Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Cathy Koerner / Michelle Posey6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Kathleen Cooney6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarla Scott / Karen Kraus vs Dana Petrusich / Julie Kim1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Casey / Hilary Johnson vs Hanny Tan / Sharr Stark4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-04-20Split 2–2
L#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Karen Dellinger6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Bonnie Bailey / Helen Lee7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesErin Casey vs Crystal Miller6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Novak / Carla Scott vs Seona Zimmermann / Kathy Briscoe6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Lyudmila Leissler
69W–45L career
not enough data
—
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84
3
Debbie Frankel
24W–58L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimberly Stockstad
18W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.