Teams

Dante's Inferno

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 55 & Over - Spring · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-23vs Miami/Garcia/55&over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux vs Jose Vila / Bryant Carreno4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesOscar Orihuela / Lawrence Chen vs Robinson Avila / GONZALO GARCIA6-7, 4-6
2026-03-10vs Leon (Deering Bay)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Stephen Cohen vs Thierry Moser / Tony Blank0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVincent Turturro / Oscar Orihuela vs Paulo Zampietro / John Yoshimura6-7, 4-6
2026-03-03vs Seute (Alper JCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Maurice Bendeck vs Alexander Seifert / Anthony Seute6-7
L#2 DoublesAnders Madsen / Sean McBrayer vs Antony van Smith / Marco Malfavon6-1, 3-6
2026-03-02vs Moskovitz (Royal Palm)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux vs John Sullivan / Felipe Blanco6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Stephen Cohen vs Eduardo Thompson / Tomas Gonzalez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesOscar Orihuela / Elie haddad vs Peter Rood / Stephen Rigl2-6, 4-6
2026-02-24vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Maurice Bendeck vs Carmelo Rubio / Miguel Miloslavich3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnders Madsen / Oscar Orihuela vs Ruben Leyva / Troy Wee Tom2-6, 2-6
2026-02-17vs Moskovitz (Royal Palm)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLawrence Chen / Gus Deribeaux vs Stephen Rigl / John Sullivan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Lehman / Stephen Cohen vs Douglas Shapiro / Mark Etzold6-3, 7-6
2026-02-10vs Miami/Garcia/55&over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnders Madsen / Stephen Cohen vs Oscar Garcia / Tomas Garcia2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesOscar Orihuela / Thierry Isambert vs Nelson Laboy / Ivan Castro2-6, 5-7
2026-02-03vs Leon (Deering Bay)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGus Deribeaux / Anders Madsen vs Paulo Zampietro / John Yoshimura5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesScott Lehman / Maurice Bendeck vs Jeffrey Fenton / Clay Campbell6-7, 4-6
2026-01-27vs Seute (Alper JCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesGus Deribeaux / Lawrence Chen vs Marco Malfavon / Oscar Barajas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Lehman / Maurice Bendeck vs Andrew Green / Neil Bazain6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnders Madsen / Sean McBrayer vs Mark D'Aguilar / Antony Page6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-20vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Gus Deribeaux vs Fernando Cruz / Ruben Serracin6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Anders Madsen vs Manuel Mejia / Christopher Kurtz3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSean McBrayer / Thierry Isambert vs Luis Rodriguez / Hubert Fonte6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lawrence Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Scott Lehman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.26
Gus Deribeaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Stephen Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Alejandro Sananez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Anders Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elie haddad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Maurice Bendeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Oscar Orihuela
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
Sean McBrayer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thierry Isambert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vincent Turturro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro Sananez + Stephen Cohen2742% games−4.9% vs expected
Maurice Bendeck + Scott Lehman2354% gamesnot enough data
Gus Deribeaux + Scott Lehman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Chen
3W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Scott Lehman
21W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Gus Deribeaux
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Stephen Cohen
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Alejandro Sananez
47W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anders Madsen
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Elie haddad
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maurice Bendeck
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Oscar Orihuela
41W–108L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sean McBrayer
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thierry Isambert
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vincent Turturro
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.