Teams

Triple Crown

2025 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-12vs ShavahoesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Villarreal / Pingui Tavera vs Dennie Huchingson / Maria Galarza-Garrett3-6, 3-6
2024-10-06vs TerminettersWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Babbitt / Aubrey Chancellor vs Christina Colwell / Anna Studt6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVeronica Flores / Lacey Shannon vs Lisa Wawrzyniak / Cynthia Pope6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPingui Tavera / Rhonda Stacy vs Chelsea Cantu / Charlotte Hayes6-2, 6-0
2024-10-05vs Tri-UsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Babbitt / Aubrey Chancellor vs Pam Gandy / Linda Wooster7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bishop / Lacey Shannon vs Rachel Gravel / Becca Noble6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Martin / Natalie Pfeiffer vs Kelly Grossman / JESSICA Sills6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Aubrey Chancellor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Catherine Babbitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Lacey Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Jill Rogers Fitch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Cyrena Durkee
published 4
3.70
Natalie Pfeiffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Pingui Tavera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Miranda Richard
published
3.42
Emi McNair
published
3.23
Rhonda Stacy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kerrie McNeel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pingui Tavera + Natalie Pfeiffer5170% games+8.4% vs expected
Emi McNair + Rhonda Stacy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aubrey Chancellor
21W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
4.48
4.5
Catherine Babbitt
53W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
Lacey Shannon
16W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
4.23
Jill Rogers Fitch
50W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Cyrena Durkee
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Natalie Pfeiffer
28W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Pingui Tavera
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Miranda Richard
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Emi McNair
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rhonda Stacy
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kerrie McNeel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.