Teams

LCTA18/Williams/LTPDI

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.28 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-21vs LCTA18/Hale/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesElyssa Snelgrove / Tessa Radziej vs Kristen Clark / Alexei Haughom6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Williams / Anastasia Brown vs Lindsey Kutlick / Melissa Gross1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMolly Sapienza / Marissa Pilku vs Tamara Hale / Nicole Boss6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adamantia Maroudas
published 4.5
4.25
Anastasia Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Catherine Weatherly
published 4.5
4.18
Emma Springs
published 4.5
4.12
Alice Kryder
published 4.5
4.10
Tessa Radziej
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Elyssa Snelgrove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Molly Sapienza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Deirdre Ryan
published 4
3.77
Marissa Pilku
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Karen Bright
published
3.71
Corinne Updegrave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Sarah Dacosta
published
3.45
Doris Glaz
published 4
Linda Costello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Updegrave + Doris Glaz3359% games+5.0% vs expected
Adamantia Maroudas + Alice Kryder5065% games−1.8% vs expected
Corinne Updegrave + Deirdre Ryan151150% games−1.9% vs expected
Corinne Updegrave + Elyssa Snelgrove12453% games−2.0% vs expected
Sarah Dacosta + Molly Sapienza10456% games−2.8% vs expected
Elyssa Snelgrove + Molly Sapienza5255% games−4.8% vs expected
Sarah Dacosta + Elyssa Snelgrove11653% games−4.8% vs expected
Sarah Dacosta + Linda Costello5250% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adamantia Maroudas
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Anastasia Brown
27W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Catherine Weatherly
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Emma Springs
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Alice Kryder
41W–27L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Tessa Radziej
39W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Elyssa Snelgrove
73W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Molly Sapienza
43W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Deirdre Ryan
96W–71L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Marissa Pilku
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Karen Bright
33W–34L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Corinne Updegrave
104W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Sarah Dacosta
52W–29L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Doris Glaz
46W–43L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Linda Costello
48W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.