Teams

Wallace - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-19vs Tran - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Clay Anderson / Arlene Doyle2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / George Rials vs Victor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi6-3, 6-2
2025-02-12vs Haigler - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Elliott / Jerry Clark vs Carol Essex / Ryan Tilley6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Sharon Powell / Marco Fuentealba6-4, 6-3
2025-02-05vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Elliott / Jerry Clark vs Celine Hansford / Andrew Hillman7-5, 6-4
2025-02-02vs Punch - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Elliott / Jerry Clark vs Farley Owens / Mary Bryan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Thuy Nguyen / Scott Aspinwall7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-29vs Covington - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Shamus Prindiville / Denise Prindiville7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-15vs O'Neill - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Cherie Tan / Doug Gonterman7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Elliott / Jerry Clark vs Matthew O'Neill / Valerie Wilson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erin Rhone
published 4
3.66
3.49
George Rials
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Jacqueline Wallace
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Jerry Clark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Kenneth Wallace
published
3.12
Mark Brabham
published
2.93
Ethan Rhone
published 3
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mecy Wimberly + John Wimberly202250% games−5.0% vs expected
Jerry Clark + Elizabeth Elliott314 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Wallace + Jacqueline Wallace213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Rhone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
George Rials
95W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Jacqueline Wallace
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
Kenneth Wallace
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Mark Brabham
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.