Teams

Toleu: Racqueteers 8.0

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 8.0 MX (FRI)

14 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-20vs Ewen 2025Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGretchen Seifert / Joel Haggerty vs Briana Hartmann / Richard Dillman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarla Toleu / Mark Gness vs Kim Loan Nguyen / Max Wilkinson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Richards / Justin Webster vs Shelley Wagener / Brett Pauley2-6, 3-6
2024-12-06vs Chu Tang Clan ES 2025Split 11
L#1 DoublesGretchen Seifert / Shravan Pargal vs Emma Wu / Alexander Tang4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPamela van Ert / Mark van Ert vs Lauren Smith-Kiewel / Adam Boyle6-1, 6-3
2024-11-22vs Strawhecker/Edmund ESLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Richards / Shravan Pargal vs Alex King / Roberta Gibbons4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPamela van Ert / Mark van Ert vs Parker Lahr / Mia Purdun6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Gness / Lana Pinnock vs Timothy Edmund / Shannon Schroeder6-3, 6-1
2024-10-25vs Ewen 2025Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Richards / Shravan Pargal vs Briana Hartmann / Richard Dillman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Finley / Mark van Ert vs Angie Flake / Max Shaughnessy3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoel Haggerty / Katie Pargal vs Rhonda Greene / Tyler Johnson6-3, 4-5
2024-10-11vs Chu Tang Clan ES 2025Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKarla Toleu / Mark Gness vs Elizabeth Kruse / Alex Gustafson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Finley / T.J. Majdecki vs Helena Chu / Matthew Chu3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Shravan Pargal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
James Joslin
published
3.87
Mark van Ert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Michelle Finley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Lana Pinnock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Katie Pargal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
T.J. Majdecki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Gretchen Seifert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Pamela van Ert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Mark Gness
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joel Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Justin Webster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karla Toleu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Richards
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Finley + T.J. Majdecki31441% games−8.7% vs expected
Shravan Pargal + Gretchen Seifert6357% games−16.0% vs expected
Pamela van Ert + Mark van Ert4650% gamesnot enough data
Pamela van Ert + Justin Webster303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Pargal + Justin Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Pinnock + Mark Gness213 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Seifert + Justin Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shravan Pargal
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
James Joslin
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Mark van Ert
20W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Michelle Finley
35W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Lana Pinnock
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Katie Pargal
27W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
T.J. Majdecki
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Gretchen Seifert
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Pamela van Ert
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mark Gness
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Joel Haggerty
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Webster
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Richards
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.