Teams

Sargeant

2024 Talbot Adult 18 & Over · Talbot Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-25vs O'NeillWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Sturtz / Masako Murphy vs Elizabeth Hamilton / Kerry O'Neill6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Chambers / Masako Murphy vs Erin LaRoque / Tracy Cronlund6-4, 6-3
2024-05-28vs O'NeillLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Sturtz / Masako Murphy vs Lellie Keating / Erika Long6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-07vs O'NeillLost 01
L#1 DoublesMasako Murphy / Jane Cross vs Elizabeth Hamilton / Erin LaRoque2-6, 5-7
2024-04-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Sturtz / Masako Murphy vs Rebecca Thomas / Tracy Cronlund7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Talbot Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne-Marie Walters
published 3.5
3.19
Abby Jacobson
published 3.5
3.13
Masako Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen McLaughlin
published
Lisa Sargeant
published
Meagan Flohr
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne-Marie Walters
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Abby Jacobson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Masako Murphy
130W–138L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Karen McLaughlin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Sargeant
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meagan Flohr
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.