Teams

TCU SHELTON

2026 FW Ladies 55 & Over winter · Sat 7.0 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2026-02-13vs SOAKS BOYDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Otto / Sherrie Panter vs Terri Wren / Gracie Santana6-0, 6-3
2026-02-08vs TCU CARTERLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Weitzer / Stephanie Daniels vs Maureen Doss / Paula Waterman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Maia Jourde vs Joan Lawson / Michelle Hyland6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Tapper / Kim Simpson vs Lisa Yager / Julie ONeil2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-01vs TCU CARTERWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Connet / Kathleen Jones vs Cynthia Carter / Paula Waterman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMeg Pope / Tricia Spann vs Joan Lawson / Janie Stephanow6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Williamson / Kim Simpson vs Marsha Scott / Michelle Hyland0-6, 6-7
2026-01-17vs TCU CARTERLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Pope / Tricia Spann vs Jan McKean / Tracey Butler4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaia Jourde / Kathleen Jones vs Marsha Scott / Paula Waterman6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Shelton / Carolyn Williamson vs Cynthia Carter / Beth Grimes4-6, 3-6
2026-01-16vs STC WOLF/PARSONSLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Stuecheli / Tricia Spann vs Donna Russell / Michele Penn2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-10vs TCU CARTERLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecky Connet / Sherrie Panter vs Sally Joslin / Jan McKean6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Weitzer / Stephanie Daniels vs Summer Richbourg / Mary McKee1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Pope / Tricia Spann vs Maureen Doss / Beth Grimes1-6, 4-6
2026-01-09vs STC ZAVASKYWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Mullins / Sherrie Panter vs Kiz Costin / Summer Richbourg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-02vs WAG ANDERSONLost 01
L#2 DoublesSherrie Panter / Diane O'Mara vs Andrea West / Cary Crawford4-6, 4-6
2026-01-02vs ATC VARGHESEWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Connet / Carol O'Hanlon vs Irene Luna / Linda Stumpff6-3, 6-2
2025-12-20vs TCU CARTERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Jones / Stephanie Daniels vs Sally Joslin / Jan McKean4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTricia Spann / Sherrie Panter vs Summer Richbourg / Tracey Butler4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Shelton / Jane Tapper vs Beth Grimes / Janie Stephanow3-6, 2-6
2025-12-19vs SOAKS BOYDWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol O'Hanlon / Becky Connet vs Rebecca Buddenbohn / Terri Wren6-1, 7-6
2025-12-13vs TCU CARTERLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Williamson / Sarah Weitzer vs Summer Richbourg / Mary McKee1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Connet / Tricia Spann vs Marsha Scott / Beth Grimes3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaia Jourde / Kathleen Jones vs Lisa Yager / Julie ONeil2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-12-12vs SOAKS BOYDWon 10
W#3 DoublesSue Stuecheli / Tricia Spann vs Debbie Abraham / Jenny Luningham6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Sat 7.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Becky Connet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Sherrie Panter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Meg Pope
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Kim Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Sarah Weitzer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Beth Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Stephanie Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Jane Tapper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Carolyn Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Tricia Spann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.99
Maia Jourde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Daniels + Maia Jourde134 matchesnot enough data
Meg Pope + Tricia Spann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Connet
42W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Sherrie Panter
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Meg Pope
10W–28L career · 10 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.20
Kim Simpson
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Sarah Weitzer
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beth Shelton
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Stephanie Daniels
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
Jane Tapper
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolyn Williamson
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tricia Spann
27W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Maia Jourde
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.