Teams

Elings-English Muffins

2025 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-07vs Alisal-RancherosWon 21
W#1 DoublesBina Ahmed / Paula Skokowski vs Walden Bohnet / Lisa Daley6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoann Hollingshead / Inna Taranchenko vs Rosemary Talmadge / Lori Travis3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPatricia English / Kristen Kovacs vs Heather Saarloos / Gigi Hollister4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs COAC-Smash SistersWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Skokowski / Alicia Linquiti vs Kelly Jensen / Naomi Eskenazi7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoann Hollingshead / Inna Taranchenko vs Katherine Fabbre / Katie Zimmerman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-09vs Pershing-UnstrungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaula Skokowski / Deborah Carlen vs Iris Campbell / Beverly Aronson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Tina Panos vs Beth Ford / Carrie Randolph7-5, 6-4
2025-11-02vs COAC-Smash SistersLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaclyn Park / Tina Panos vs Katherine Fabbre / Jill Sagner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Paula Skokowski vs Julie Rosenthal / Lacy Selby6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKristen Kovacs / Paula Skokowski vs Millie Tadewaldt / BROOKE COSTELLO6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Tina Panos vs Rebecca Goebel / Caron Berryhill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Alisal-RancherosWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Kristen Kovacs vs Lisa Daley / Gigi Hollister4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Nina Gustason vs Julianna Adelman / Rosemary Talmadge5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJaclyn Park / Joann Hollingshead vs Joni Martino / Jen Haskell2-6, 3-6
2025-10-05vs Pershing-UnstrungWon 21
L#1 DoublesNina Gustason / Kristen Kovacs vs Beth Ford / Jacqui Burge4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Patricia English vs Daisy Carlson / Catherine Gill2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoann Hollingshead / Jaclyn Park vs Carrie Randolph / Christina Stoney3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Patricia English vs Jill Crang / Nancy Lavender1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNina Gustason / Kristen Kovacs vs Lacy Selby / Michelle Fitzpatrick6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoann Hollingshead / Inna Taranchenko vs Julie Rosenthal / Jill Morison2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Paula Skokowski vs Katherine Benaron / Millie Tadewaldt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Kovacs / Jeanelle Posch vs Andreana Jones / Kathrina Cruz7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Bina Ahmed
published 4
3.74
Stacey Gannon
published
3.73
Paula Skokowski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kristen Kovacs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Deborah Carlen
published 4
3.55
Alicia Linquiti
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Heather Reed
published 4
3.46
Patricia English
published
3.36
Jeanelle Posch
published
3.35
Tina Panos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Joann Hollingshead
published
3.30
Inna Taranchenko
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.30
Jaclyn Park
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Nina Gustason
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Kovacs + Alicia Linquiti3256% games+13.2% vs expected
Deborah Carlen + Paula Skokowski11357% games+5.3% vs expected
Patricia English + Heather Reed6549% games+3.8% vs expected
Jaclyn Park + Tina Panos312056% games+3.4% vs expected
Heather Reed + Kristen Kovacs9652% games+3.1% vs expected
Alicia Linquiti + Joann Hollingshead3742% games+2.0% vs expected
Nina Gustason + Jaclyn Park5851% games+0.9% vs expected
Kristen Kovacs + Paula Skokowski9751% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bina Ahmed
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Stacey Gannon
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Paula Skokowski
51W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kristen Kovacs
64W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Deborah Carlen
24W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Alicia Linquiti
91W–67L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Heather Reed
69W–44L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Patricia English
28W–39L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.46
Jeanelle Posch
47W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Tina Panos
61W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Joann Hollingshead
12W–34L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Inna Taranchenko
104W–67L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Jaclyn Park
86W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Nina Gustason
75W–99L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.