Teams

Cook/JB/JCC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5 Novice - Women · 2.5 Novice - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-22vs Carpenter/JB/RPCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Worlow / Leisa Spence vs Taylor Waddell / Paige Gilbert0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Cook / Lauren Nunnally vs Britney Greene / Jordan Johnson1-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs Trimarchi/JB/APWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Cook / Lauren Nunnally vs Whitney Robinson / Olivia Lawshe6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Leonard / Kara Keith vs Caitlin Sullins / Brandy Johnston6-1, 6-1
2025-05-13vs Trimarchi/JB/APWon 21
W#1 DoublesBobbi Hydrick / Katie Leonard vs Olivia Lawshe / Brandy Johnston6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKara Keith vs Kelli Adkins7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeredith Cook / Lauren Nunnally vs April Grove / Caitlin Sullins0-6, 3-6
2025-04-19vs Chambers/JB/APCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Leonard / Kara Keith vs June Long / Audra McClung6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBobbi Hydrick vs Beth McCartney6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeredith Cook / Lauren Nunnally vs Hannah Chambers / Linda Smith0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Novice - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Bobbi Hydrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.37
Kara Keith
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.19
Katie Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Bethany Noto
published 2.5
2.07
Casey Worlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
Meredith Cook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.84
Lauren Nunnally
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Leisa Spence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Cook + Lauren Nunnally1529% gamesnot enough data
Katie Leonard + Kara Keith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bobbi Hydrick
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Kara Keith
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Katie Leonard
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Bethany Noto
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Casey Worlow
4W–16L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Meredith Cook
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Lauren Nunnally
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Leisa Spence
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.