Teams

BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · BC Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodani3.5000000
2BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark3.5000000
3BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman3.5000000
4BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5000000
5BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSoco3.5000000
6BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaport3.5000000
7BC-MCC/AmySchmargen3.5000000
8BC-MCC/KristieSherrill3.5000000
9BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5000000
10BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5000000
11BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff3.5000000
12BC-Kramer/ColleenPost3.5000000
13BC-MCC/LesleyLyon3.5000000
14BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5000000
15BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Suzette Ibanez
published
3.46
Kristin Almeida
published 3.5
3.44
3.34
Aimee Kuan
published 3.5
3.34
Vanessa Hyttenberg
published
3.31
Christine Reeds
published 3.5
3.30
Mary Bunting
published
3.25
Yoshiun Wong
published
3.25
Kathy Kim
published
3.22
Suzanne Scott
published
3.21
Cynthia Catibog
published 3.5
3.20
Hazel Evans
published 3.5
3.20
Allyn Leoff
published 3.5
3.17
Yume Han
published
3.15
Katy Carr
published
3.10
Joyce Choi
published
3.06
Sherri Medeiros
published
2.96
Bridget Parrilla
published 3
2.84
Rachel Fournier
published
2.64
Madhu Sridharan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Almeida + Suzette Ibanez4175% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Almeida + Aimee Kuan134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Kim + Christine Reeds224 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Parrilla + Rachel Fournier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzette Ibanez
20W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Kristin Almeida
78W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Maricel Pilapil-Pureza
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Aimee Kuan
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Vanessa Hyttenberg
10W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Christine Reeds
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Mary Bunting
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Yoshiun Wong
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Kathy Kim
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
Suzanne Scott
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia Catibog
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Hazel Evans
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Allyn Leoff
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Yume Han
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
Katy Carr
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Joyce Choi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sherri Medeiros
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Bridget Parrilla
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Rachel Fournier
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Madhu Sridharan
21W–14L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.