Teams

R-Goodwin Frozen Solid Sat/NMP

2021-2022 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division B (3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-01-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Jennifer Higgins vs Sandy McAlpine / Shelly Steffey3-6, 6-7
2021-12-19vs R-Earnshaw/SkybrookLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Hendershott / Anette Solmaz vs Nell Wilson / Denise Napier6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-12-04vs R-Hebert LKN ICE QUEENS/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Dina White vs Buket Boucher / Nancy Williams6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division B (3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Higgins
published
3.48
Dina White
published 3.5
3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Nina Tracy
published
3.40
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Janice Daniel
published
3.09
Susan Bumgarner
published
3.03
Anette Solmaz
published 3.5
2.91
Margaret Dittemore
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.88
Maria Solorzano
published
2.79
Heather Hendershott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Wendy Goodwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Daniel + Denise Bost5255% games−2.7% vs expected
Heather Hendershott + Margaret Dittemore5065% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Japec + Margaret Dittemore2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Higgins
28W–23L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dina White
20W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Nina Tracy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Denise Bost
206W–139L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Janice Daniel
41W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Susan Bumgarner
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Anette Solmaz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Margaret Dittemore
52W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
Maria Solorzano
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Heather Hendershott
52W–58L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Wendy Goodwin
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.