Teams

Stromberg Smash Squad

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-24vs Hultman/Johnson HelKats Summer 2025Split 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Haynes / Donna Homan vs Kathleen Hultman / Allison Jopke5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Htoo Say2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Danielson / Laurie Riepe vs Julie Hoffer / Colleen Malmgren6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Johnson / Lisa Neddermeyer vs Verena van Fleet / Lanette Wedell2-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs ICC 18 3.0Won 31
L#1 DoublesJessica Galatz / Michelle Pelland vs Lauren Overholser / Lindsay Hill1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Coley Hockett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarb Johnson / Katy Petersen vs Katherine Warner / Paola Cristallini6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRachel Madden vs Katy Farley6-2, 7-5
2025-06-12vs Schoenecker Summer 3.0 S25Won 31
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Ann Cadwell6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Haynes / Michelle Pelland vs Danielle Stewart / Nissrine Nakib6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRachel Madden vs Mary Tham6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarb Johnson / Katy Petersen vs Christina Hughes / Muqing Li6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-06-05vs OlsonLost 14
L#1 DoublesJodi Danielson / Donna Homan vs Laurie Walsh / Lisa Kent4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Shannon Murphy6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Johnson / Rachel Madden vs Marie Plourde / Eleanor Wickstrom3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTiffany Liebert vs Wendy Nguyen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarb Johnson / Lisa Neddermeyer vs Murphy Anderson / Maren Franzen4-6, 1-6
2025-05-15vs ICC 18 3.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesDonna Homan / Tiffany Liebert vs Kathryn Aronson / Jasmine Scarlett2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Madden vs Katherine Warner6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarb Johnson / Michelle Pelland vs Julia Valente / Kristin Smith1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Galatz vs Erin Schultz7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurie Riepe / Stephanie Johnson vs Paola Cristallini / Maria Bloomfield7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Meredith Stromberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Amy Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Rachel Madden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Sharia Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Michelle Pelland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Yelena Yan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Barb Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Jodi Danielson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Laurie Riepe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Katy Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Donna Homan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Jessica Galatz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.50
Tiffany Liebert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Lisa Neddermeyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Marble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Haynes + Meredith Stromberg14464% games+6.0% vs expected
Katy Petersen + Barb Johnson6553% games−1.0% vs expected
Barb Johnson + Michelle Pelland224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Stromberg
54W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Amy Haynes
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Rachel Madden
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sharia Carlson
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Michelle Pelland
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Barb Johnson
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Jodi Danielson
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Laurie Riepe
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Katy Petersen
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Donna Homan
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Jessica Galatz
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Tiffany Liebert
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lisa Neddermeyer
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Sandra Marble
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.