Teams

Brenau-Bartlett

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-11Split 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Long / Cathryn Sawyer vs Kathy White / Barb Miller4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Souther / Barbara Gilbert vs Cindy Reed / Darcey Latzsch1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-04Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKathleen Petro / Peggy Blackmon vs Phyllis Gailey / Angie Sisk2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Souther / Susan Bradley vs Kerry Whitlock / Barbara Dumont5-7, 2-6
2024-10-28Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro vs Angie Sisk / Barb Miller2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLory Tuholski / Cathryn Sawyer vs Phyllis Gailey / Theresa Heffernan6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarie Bartlett / Jackie Mauldin vs Darcey Latzsch / Kathy White5-7, 0-6
2024-10-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLory Tuholski / Barbara Gauthier vs Amy Lane / Leisa Smith6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gilbert / Robin Foster vs Barbara Dumont / Cindy Reed7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-14Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Petro / Lory Tuholski vs Angie Sisk / Amy Lane3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Gilbert / Sandra Souther vs Phyllis Gailey / Barb Miller0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Blackmon / Cathryn Sawyer vs Debbie Adamson / Kerry Whitlock5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-07Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Petro / Debbie Westray vs Angie Sisk / Barb Miller2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Long / Robin Foster vs Phyllis Gailey / Theresa Heffernan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathryn Sawyer / Susan Bradley vs Leisa Smith / Kathy White6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chestatee-Gailey5113514131
2Brenau-Bartlett1551329193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Lory Tuholski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.83
Barbara Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kathleen Petro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Karen Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Cathryn Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Debbie Westray
usually #4 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.35
Barbara Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Alene KIesel
published 2.5
Jackie Mauldin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Blackmon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Souther
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Tuholski + Kathleen Petro5159% games+15.6% vs expected
Barbara Gauthier + Kathleen Petro16754% games+6.6% vs expected
Lory Tuholski + Barbara Gauthier4552% games+3.8% vs expected
Sandra Souther + Barbara Gilbert134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Westray + Lory Tuholski224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Long + Peggy Blackmon123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Gilbert + Peggy Blackmon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lory Tuholski
66W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Barbara Gauthier
43W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Kathleen Petro
51W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Karen Long
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Cathryn Sawyer
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Debbie Westray
9W–28L career · 9 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Barbara Gilbert
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Alene KIesel
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Mauldin
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marie Bartlett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Blackmon
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Souther
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.