← Teams

LRC Litch-Fynboe

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Richard Graham
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.22
Charlie Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Pete Addison
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results16 ties
2021-09-19Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRandy Litch / Pete Addison vs Christopher Gilmore / Alan Montrose7-5, 6-3
2021-09-19Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRandy Litch / Pete Addison vs John Popplewell / Roger North5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-17Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Floyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils6-2, 7-6
2021-08-28Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs David Gravenkemper / Stuart Oswald2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Chris Fynboe vs Andrew Osborne / Rob Leinbach6-3, 6-2
2021-08-28Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Will Blanchard / Lee Colclasure6-2, 6-0
2021-08-27Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Thomas Reber vs Adam Gamboa / Jason Ruhmann6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Chris Collins / Jack Hughes5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-26Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRandy Litch / Pete Addison vs James Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Paul Whittaker vs Bill Henderson / Jeffrey Krum7-6, 7-5
2021-06-24Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesPaul Whittaker / Charlie Hyde vs William Cohon / Wolf Yeigh6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Mark Hayter vs Paul Reni / Dennis Salveson6-2, 6-3
2020-11-08Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesPete Addison / Mark Hayter vs Gerald Nelson / Kevin Robinson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Paul Whittaker vs Darrel Leimback / Mike Roy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-07Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesRichard Graham / Randy Litch vs Roan Blacker / John Cattell6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPete Addison / John Shelton vs Mark Alderson / Chris Blankenship3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-10-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Mark Horn / James Ferguson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-10-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Randy Litch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-10-10Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesChris Fynboe / Richard Graham vs Darrel Leimback / Douglas Mayne6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Drake Nicholson / Kevin Robinson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-09-20Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Mark Polcyn vs Jeff Engle / Thomas Henderson7-6, 6-4
2020-09-13Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCharlie Hyde / Mark Polcyn vs Joseph Battaglino / Mark Horn6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Graham / John Shelton vs Roan Blacker / John Cattell6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Mark Alderson / Chris Blankenship7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2020-09-11Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesChris Fynboe / Richard Graham vs Gerald Nelson / Kevin Robinson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPete Addison / Randy Litch vs Gary Maciejewski / John Lindberg6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Richard Graham
131W–70L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Charlie Hyde
28W–31L career
4%95%1%
3.22
3.5
Pete Addison
77W–96L career
2%98%0%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.