Teams

SD 4.0 Lake Murray (2:2)/ Hill

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE · SD - Men - 4.0 WE

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (3:1)/ VannLost 01
L#1 DoublesSeth Hill / M Edelson vs Joe Economou / Ricky Sanchez6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-03-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Sam Meza / Adan Provencio6-3, 6-1
2023-03-05vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ ChannickWon 10
W#1 DoublesJess Zlotnik / M Edelson vs Jeffrey Steen / Scott Atwood6-1, 7-6
2023-02-26vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (3:1)/ VannWon 10
W#1 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs DAN CARRICO / Joe Economou6-3, 6-1
2023-02-19vs SD LLW 4.0 Balboa TC/ BarraquioLost 01
L#1 DoublesM Edelson / Edward Grader vs Joseph Barraquio / John Carter3-6, 5-7
2023-02-05vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (3:1)/ VannWon 10
W#2 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Gary Baer / DAN CARRICO6-1, 6-2
2023-01-22vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ ChannickWon 10
W#3 DoublesM Edelson / Jess Zlotnik vs Ryan Adams / Marc Channick7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2023-01-08vs SD LLW 4.0 Balboa TC/ BarraquioWon 10
W#1 DoublesJess Zlotnik / M Edelson vs Joseph Barraquio / Adan Provencio7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Andrew Gilcrest
published 4
3.83
Jess Zlotnik
published
3.81
Edward Grader
published 4
3.77
M Edelson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.76
Seth Hill
published
3.69
Jeffrey Hsu
published
3.17
Matt George
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Hill + Edward Grader3357% games+4.2% vs expected
M Edelson + Jess Zlotnik314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Gilcrest + M Edelson303 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Gilcrest + Seth Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Gilcrest
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jess Zlotnik
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Edward Grader
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
M Edelson
47W–53L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Seth Hill
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Jeffrey Hsu
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Matt George
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.