Teams

IE-Elevenis-Boland

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-21vs IE-LLW-Bear Valley-HD Elite-MejiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMax Austin / Dang Nguyen vs Nolan Earl / Ralph Pena1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMax Austin / Kyle Langenbacher vs Jason Maslach / James Hoffman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-18vs IE-LLW-Bear Valley-HD Elite-MejiaLost 01
L#2 SinglesMax Austin vs Jayce Graham7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-17vs IE-Canyon Lake-HansonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMax Austin / Hung Pham vs Eric Lee / Brett Marymee1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Spencer Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Ryan Roland
published
3.90
Michael Munoz
published
3.85
Max Austin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Brett DeCicco
published 4
3.79
Hung Pham
published 4
3.77
Jie Mei
published
3.77
Roman Chon
published
3.76
Jerry Jeen Lee
published
3.69
Kyle Langenbacher
published
3.57
Dang Nguyen
published 4
3.35
Matthew Boland
published
Christian Henish
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Langenbacher + Roman Chon5549% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Spencer Nguyen
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Ryan Roland
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Michael Munoz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Max Austin
48W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Brett DeCicco
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Hung Pham
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Jie Mei
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Roman Chon
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Jerry Jeen Lee
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Kyle Langenbacher
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dang Nguyen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Matthew Boland
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christian Henish
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.