Teams

LATA 4.5M 18 & Over (Hunter)

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 4.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-23vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Katie Meyers vs Alex Echols / Katherine Mathis7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJordan Hunter / Alyssa Blanchard vs Charles Webb / Marlene Robinson0-1
2026-06-16vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKyle Edwards / Amanda Malatek vs Boone Walker / Kacey Rugg6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Roche Sr / Alexis Adams vs Josey Iliff / Marlene Robinson3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJordan Hunter / Alyssa Blanchard vs David Collins / Teri Grote0-1
2026-06-09vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Junis / Sally Nguyen vs Ryan Auger / Katherine Mathis6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Roche Sr / Kristin Estes vs Marlene Robinson / Jenkins Mann6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEric Hogue / Jeannette Hammers vs David Collins / Kacey Rugg6-4, 6-2
2026-06-02vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Roche Sr / Katie Meyers vs Charles Webb / Laura Plyler6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Junis / Sally Nguyen vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKyle Edwards / Madeleine Moore vs Alex Echols / Shannon Powers6-4, 6-2
2026-06-02vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Hogue / Jeannette Hammers vs Boone Walker / Marlene Robinson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Edwards / Amanda Malatek vs Charles Webb / Shannon Powers6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Carlynn Musil vs Alex Echols / Katherine Mathis6-3, 6-4
2026-05-19vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Junis / Katie Meyers vs Ryan Auger / Shannon Powers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Hogue / Jeannette Hammers vs Gabrielle DuBruille / Josey Iliff6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Kristin Estes vs David Collins / Kacey Rugg6-7, 2-6
2026-05-12vs LATA18/Robinson/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Junis / Carlynn Musil vs Boone Walker / Teri Grote6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKyle Edwards / Madeleine Moore vs David Collins / Kacey Rugg4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Sally Nguyen vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Adult Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 4.5M 18 & Over (Hunter)5213819183
2LATA18/Robinson/CTFC2581328210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Alyssa Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.44
Jeannette Hammers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Amanda Malatek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Eric Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
Jordan Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Carlynn Musil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Wescott
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Madeleine Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Kyle Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Kristin Estes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Joseph Roche Sr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Sally Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.03
Katie Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Cory Hunter
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeleine Moore + Kyle Edwards314 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Blanchard + Jordan Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Hogue + Jeannette Hammers213 matchesnot enough data
Carlynn Musil + Andrew Wescott303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alyssa Blanchard
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
4.46
Jeannette Hammers
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Amanda Malatek
4W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
Eric Hogue
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
4.41
Jordan Hunter
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Carlynn Musil
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
Madeleine Moore
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
Kyle Edwards
22W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Joseph Roche Sr
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Sally Nguyen
57W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.12
Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Cory Hunter
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.