Teams

TKharva-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-17vs KRamaswamy-ENOLost 13
L#1 DoublesConor Lynch / Raphael Orenstein vs Vidit Desai / Rajeev Bhogadi0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRyan Curet vs Anjaneya Tiwari2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Hunter / Steven Schneider vs Ramamoorthy Makkithaya / Monty Gaither4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Rizzuto / Daniel Moore vs Shivam Panthri / Srihari Murthy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-29vs RGriffin-ENOSplit 22
W#1 DoublesThomas Newton / Anthony Rizzuto vs Richard Griffin / Jonathan Ryan4-2
W#1 SinglesTejas Kharva vs Dan Kane6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Lin / Joe Park vs Michael Muller / Stephen Fu2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Hunter / Raphael Orenstein vs Austin Odling / Richard Millard5-7, 2-6
2025-02-26vs KRamaswamy-ENOWon 21
L#1 DoublesConor Lynch / Raphael Orenstein vs Monty Gaither / Shivam Panthri4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRyan Curet vs Ravi Verma6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnthony Rizzuto / Thomas Newton vs Seshagiri Kalluru / Srihari Murthy6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ryan Curet
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.39
Anthony Rizzuto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Tejas Kharva
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Joe Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Michael Andre
published
2.99
Joshua Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Conor Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Raphael Orenstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Antonio Parham
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Conor Lynch + Raphael Orenstein1437% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Curet
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anthony Rizzuto
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tejas Kharva
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Joe Park
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Michael Andre
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Joshua Hunter
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Conor Lynch
17W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Raphael Orenstein
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
3.5
Antonio Parham
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.