Teams

ATC/Kimura

2026 COTA Mixed Tri-level Winter 2025 (non-advancing) · Flight II- 8.0, 7.5, 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-11vs TGC/ChristianWon 30
W#1 DoublesShune Kimura / Kylie Skrzypinski vs Raymond Donovan / Whitney Bruniera7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Beadles / Emily Harrison vs Jaime Christian / Kevin Kummerer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Czarick / Christine Czarick vs Irene Kummerer / Jason Dalton6-4, 6-1
2026-01-04vs DeLa/AlexWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Thebeau / Emily Claire Kelly vs Chris Hulsey / Amelia DeLamater7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShune Kimura / Maureen Truett vs Kyle Bickwit / Jackie Sherry6-4, 4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Beadles / Rebecca Rinckey vs David Alexander / Sydney Felker6-3, 6-1
2025-12-21vs ATC GattikerWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerence Martin / Laina Taylor vs Christopher Clark / Amberlee Aboomar1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBo Kidd / Emily Claire Kelly vs Chad Millard / Candace Crenshaw7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClark Johnson / Rebecca Rinckey vs Eli Truett / Lisa Bowen7-5, 4-6, 6-1
2025-12-14vs TOB/KimbrellSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMax Thebeau / Monica Skrzypinski vs Curt Seymour / Phyllis Chambers6-4, 4-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAdam Beadles / Anna-Maria Martin vs Lindsey Dunning / Jason Shay6-2, 4-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs OVP/Ivester/DeanLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Harrison / Kethan Darbar vs Elisabeth Drake / Nathan Myers3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMax Thebeau / Monica Skrzypinski vs Elliott Johnson / Elizabeth Sadler7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnna-Maria Martin / Terence Martin vs Loretta Newcomer / Quint Newcomer4-6, 5-7
2025-11-16vs OVP/Dean Team 2 (L2)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaina Taylor / Bo Kidd vs Matthew Howard / Rebecca Rea1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Truett / Clark Johnson vs Vanessa SHONKWILER / Chris Bachman2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Czarick / Christine Czarick vs Sonya Peacock / Meyur Vashi2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Flight II- 8.0, 7.5, 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OVP/Dean Team 2 (L2)6013513157
2ATC/Kimura4210819176
3DeLa/Alex3310818185
4ATC Gattiker339920181
5TOB/Kimbrell339920180
6OVP/Ivester/Dean2481020170
7TGC/Christian0641429194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Kethan Darbar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Laina Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Bo Kidd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Adam Beadles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Emily Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.63
Clark Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.61
Maureen Truett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Rebecca Rinckey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Terence Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Shune Kimura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Matthew Czarick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Anna-Maria Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Emily Claire Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Monica Skrzypinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Christine Czarick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kylie Skrzypinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Max Thebeau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Czarick + Christine Czarick4453% games+6.2% vs expected
Terence Martin + Anna-Maria Martin2641% games−2.8% vs expected
Kylie Skrzypinski + Max Thebeau404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Harrison + Shune Kimura213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kethan Darbar
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Laina Taylor
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Bo Kidd
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Adam Beadles
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
Emily Harrison
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.74
3.5
Clark Johnson
28W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
Maureen Truett
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
Rebecca Rinckey
53W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Terence Martin
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shune Kimura
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Matthew Czarick
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Anna-Maria Martin
12W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Emily Claire Kelly
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Monica Skrzypinski
69W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Christine Czarick
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kylie Skrzypinski
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Max Thebeau
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.