Teams

ABCC - Johnson

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-08vs Glen Kernan - RawlsWon 31
L#1 DoublesVicky Lane / Angie Talbott vs Christi Bisson / Kari Barron6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Sheain vs Lauren Devereaux7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Creveling / Sarah Johnson vs Amber Kenney / Danijela Pope6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Nakamura / Mary Jenkins vs Teresa Westerman / Connie Rouls7-5, 6-1
2026-03-01vs Jax Beach - WatersLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Johnson / Lisa Goodrich vs Aura Bernal / Rosemarie Prokop6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Miller / Angie Talbott vs Diane Stone / Elizabeth Messina6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Creveling / Amy Nakamura vs Tammy Oswald / Michelle Jahn1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-15vs Duval/ValinhoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Goodrich / Vicky Lane vs Linda Valinho / Lisa Woods4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMegan Sheain vs Teya McDermand6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Jayme Lemke vs Lyndsay Proly / Susan Chiang3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Smith / Mary Jenkins vs Lisa Leddy / Natalie Gettemy6-2, 6-3
2026-02-08vs Baymeadows - AndersenWon 31
W#1 DoublesVictoria Miller / Lisa Goodrich vs Kim Costello / Mary Helen Goodwin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngie Talbott / Claudia Adams vs Pam Poynton / Oksana Andersen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Johnson / Vicky Lane vs Sherry Hutzler / Geraldine Millares6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMegan Sheain / Mary Jenkins vs Deidra Johnson / Anna Hastings6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-31vs Yards - McKillopWon 40
W#1 DoublesVictoria Miller / Angie Talbott vs Michelle Johnson / Renee Callahan6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodrich vs Emily Hicks6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVicky Lane / Lisa Smith vs Kathy DeJesus / Kristina Powell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Johnson / Mary Jenkins vs Heather LaFera / Pilar Escuder6-4, 6-0
2026-01-25vs Sawgrass - TobyLost 13
W#1 DoublesLisa Goodrich / Angie Talbott vs Aisling Toby / Lorrayne Carless6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVicky Lane / Jayme Lemke vs Jennifer Greer / Robin Corley6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Creveling / Lisa Smith vs Rhonda Gummerman / Christina Felsing3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesMegan Sheain / Mary Jenkins vs Stacy Rendzio / Liz Owen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-18vs San Jose - WiseLost 14
L#1 DoublesVicky Lane / Angie Talbott vs Nancy Hennessy / Heather Riley4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodrich vs Natasha Eliz6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Sheain / Jayme Lemke vs Emily Dostie / Julie Boone1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Creveling / Sarah Johnson vs Laurie Scott / Allison Wise6-7, 5-7
L#4 DoublesMary Jenkins / Lisa Smith vs Dawn Siebenhaar / Michelle Kalil1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lisa Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.43
Angie Talbott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Megan Sheain
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.26
Jayme Lemke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Nakamura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Claudia Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Mary Jenkins
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Lisa Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Vicky Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Christine Creveling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Smith + Vicky Lane123 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Lane + Angie Talbott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Goodrich
9W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Angie Talbott
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Megan Sheain
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Jayme Lemke
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Nakamura
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Claudia Adams
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Jenkins
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Lisa Smith
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Vicky Lane
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Christine Creveling
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.