Teams

World Tennis Club - Calkins

2024 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Winter · Mixed 55 & over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Forbes / Mercedes Calkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-02vs World Tennis Center - J. BlumWon 10
W#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Charles St. Jean vs Kirk Huey / Barbara Tilley6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Charles St. Jean vs David Townsley / Lori Murphy2-6, 5-7
2024-02-03vs Players Club - HofmannLost 01
L#2 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Charles St. Jean vs Andrew Good / Allison Lebo3-6, 3-6
2024-01-28vs COLLIER/Belcastro/55&over8.0MXDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Charles St. Jean vs Joanne Belcastro / Matt Webster2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-27vs World Tennis Center - J. BlumLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles St. Jean / Mercedes Calkins vs Aggie Rupert / Kirk Huey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-01-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesMercedes Calkins / Charles St. Jean vs Mary Wright / John Wright6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-17vs COLLIER/Belcastro/55&over8.0MXDWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles St. Jean / Mercedes Calkins vs Joanne Belcastro / Matt Webster7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Gary Durante
published 4.5
3.95
3.70
Fred Drilling
published 4
3.69
Tracy Lockton
published
3.62
Charles St. Jean
published 4
3.42
Tamara Durante
published
Christine Calisi
published 3.5
3.10
Gunther Schmiedl
published 3.5
3.08
Robert Forbes
published
Jeff Lassell
published
Mercedes Calkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vesna Petrovic
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gary Durante
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Elizabeth Lawnicki
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Fred Drilling
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Tracy Lockton
99W–49L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Charles St. Jean
32W–35L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.62
Tamara Durante
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christine Calisi
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gunther Schmiedl
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
Robert Forbes
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jeff Lassell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mercedes Calkins
62W–33L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vesna Petrovic
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.