Teams

X18 8.0 MV2 Haught

2024 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 8.0 Mixed

20 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-28vs X18 8.0 WR ClarkLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Bensimone / Chipo Jolibois vs Stephanie Sneed / Jeffrey Tong3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCurtis Ottens / Erica Wigton vs Courtney Foster / Ryan Hannan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Palermo / Lishan Zhang vs Eric van Airsdale / Allison Sency4-6, 2-6
2024-07-21vs X18 8.0 MV3 SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeonid Zelikman / Chipo Jolibois vs Alesia Jones / Timothy Jones3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Bruce Bensimone vs Caroline Schwartz / Ying Lin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Haught / Marybeth Esposito vs Holly Etzkin / Patrick Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-14vs X18 8.0 PCC InnesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Palermo / Lishan Zhang vs Gary Innes / Laurice Moore5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Ken Gustafson vs David Torres / Eileen Brown1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-30vs X18 8.0 LT1 BanasLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurtis Ottens / Marisa Fiucci Rosen vs Brian Banas / Donna Balc2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeonid Zelikman / Yulia Lyublinski vs Akin Fashina / Karyn Costin0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKen Gustafson / Elyse Gustafson vs Stephen DeBacco / Selena Kim1-6, 1-6
2024-06-23vs X18 8.0 NC WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesChipo Jolibois / Daniel Palermo vs Benjamin McKnight / Rachael Williams5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCurtis Ottens / Erica Wigton vs Thomas Horwood / Rachel Harris3-6, 2-6
2024-06-16vs X18 8.0 TP SchaffnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSai Venkata / Dongmei Zhang vs Cora Shane / Brian Travers1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Ken Gustafson vs Shelby Schaffner / Josh Derrig7-6, 6-4
2024-06-09vs X18 8.0 PM PerkinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKen Gustafson / Lishan Zhang vs Adam Perkins / ASHLEY ROBERTS0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Omar Baez Coronel vs Brian Rector / Madison Shami4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChipo Jolibois / GAUTAM PATHAK vs Nicole Mikolich / David Rickard1-6, 4-6
2024-06-02vs X18 8.0 MV1 ColeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKen Gustafson / Erica Wigton vs Frank Mercuri / Amy Zucca7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Palermo / Chipo Jolibois vs Eric Mock / Caren Kirchick7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBruce Bensimone / Marybeth Esposito vs Joseph Stimac / Patricia Mercuri6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-19vs X18 8.0 LT2 SimonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Haught / Jennifer Minotas vs Ryoichi Fujiwara / Casye Hammer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Palermo / Shelley Li vs Christa Galehouse / Lion Moeliono4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Esposito / GAUTAM PATHAK vs Alicia Blessing / Spencer Crawley6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA 18&O 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 8.0 NC Williams8120719220
2X18 8.0 LT1 Banas7221614170
3X18 8.0 MV3 Smith6320719200
4X18 8.0 PCC Innes63141331247
5X18 8.0 LT2 Simon45121532245
6X18 8.0 WR Clark45131433261
7X18 8.0 MV1 Cole36101737257
8X18 8.0 PM Perkins36101737275
9X18 8.0 TP Schaffner2791838283
10X18 8.0 MV2 Haught2762142269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Sai Venkata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Curtis Ottens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
GAUTAM PATHAK
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Ken Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Marisa Fiucci Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Erica Wigton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Daniel Palermo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.53
Shelley Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Yulia Lyublinski
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.45
Omar Baez Coronel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Bruce Bensimone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Chipo Jolibois
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.40
Robert Haught
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.33
Dongmei Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Lishan Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Elyse Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jean Roman
published
Jennifer Minotas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leonid Zelikman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marybeth Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Haught + Lishan Zhang15660% games+11.1% vs expected
GAUTAM PATHAK + Marybeth Esposito5353% games+1.0% vs expected
Yulia Lyublinski + Robert Haught5555% games+0.6% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Ken Gustafson121350% games+0.5% vs expected
Omar Baez Coronel + Yulia Lyublinski4160% games−2.2% vs expected
Daniel Palermo + Marisa Fiucci Rosen2431% games−5.2% vs expected
Daniel Palermo + Marybeth Esposito5259% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Ottens + Marisa Fiucci Rosen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sai Venkata
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Curtis Ottens
28W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
GAUTAM PATHAK
113W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Ken Gustafson
139W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Marisa Fiucci Rosen
61W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Erica Wigton
45W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Daniel Palermo
43W–59L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
Shelley Li
27W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Yulia Lyublinski
131W–80L career · 11 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Omar Baez Coronel
38W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.45
4
Bruce Bensimone
27W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
85W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Robert Haught
113W–66L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Dongmei Zhang
87W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
Lishan Zhang
132W–84L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Elyse Gustafson
103W–128L career · 7 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Jean Roman
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Minotas
24W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Leonid Zelikman
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marybeth Esposito
115W–74L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.