Teams

Malchow/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Monday PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-28vs Nemala/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Dixon / John Faldetta vs Michael McKeown / Mark Sargent5-7, 4-6
2025-06-30vs Nemala/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Faldetta / Spartacus Crawford vs Michael McKeown / Mark Sargent6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Snap / Mark Hammond vs Josh Packard / VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Monday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Connor Malchow
published 4.5
4.19
Charles Hawkins
published 4.5
4.18
Spartacus Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
John Faldetta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Brandon Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Jason Snap
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Evan Curran
published
3.77
Hitesh Dhingra
published
3.72
Luke Krehbiel
published
3.63
John Piovarcy
published
3.54
Michael Ellsworth
published
Brandon Keane
published 3.5
Joe Tatum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Dixon + John Piovarcy134 matchesnot enough data
John Piovarcy + Jason Snap224 matchesnot enough data
Spartacus Crawford + Connor Malchow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Malchow
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Charles Hawkins
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Spartacus Crawford
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
John Faldetta
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Brandon Dixon
11W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jason Snap
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Evan Curran
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Hitesh Dhingra
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
Luke Krehbiel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.72
John Piovarcy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Michael Ellsworth
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Brandon Keane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Tatum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.