Teams

Creech-Lob Marleys-Coles Crossing

*2025 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesKari Harrison / Heather Nagy vs Marcela Villarreal / Eugenia Montalvo3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGena Jacobsen vs Taylor Winkler6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Davenport / Ashley Wacasey vs Lizzett Handal / Anitra Edney5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Bvunzawabaya / Becky Martancik vs Norma Marquez / Charlotte Copestake0-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs Doyle-Slammers-KCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBecky Martancik / Meghan Bvunzawabaya vs Seda Gunduz / Brandee Johnsen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Nagy / Tracy Clayton vs Kathleen Perry / Sandra Swift6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Davenport / Lauren Stewart vs Linda Dalton / Theresa Jardine6-0, 6-1
2025-06-18vs Palamar-Volley Girls-BentwaterWon 32
W#1 DoublesKari Harrison / Ashley Wacasey vs Lynn Arthur / Amy Wallingford6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesGena Jacobsen vs Dana Saunders0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTiffani Johnson / Jill Rayburn vs Suzanne Dupre / Bridget Seals6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAshley Creech vs Brenda Palamar6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEmily Roberts / Becky Martancik vs Margaret Mattix / Tanya Charron4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAnnMarie Cogdill / Andrea Nicholas vs Chelsea KENDRICK / Meghan Skrien5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Martancik / Meghan Bvunzawabaya vs Thy Nguyen / Brittany Noyes6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTracy Clayton vs Ashley Dalrymple2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAnna Davenport / Heather Nagy vs Polly Hunt / Kimberlee Combs2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRory Autry vs Adriana Hernandez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Stewart / Kari Harrison vs Erin Smith / Paola Tucker6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTracy Clayton vs Andrianna Cole2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Roberts / Jill Rayburn vs Jennifer Guillory / Wendy Liddell6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGena Jacobsen vs Katherina Santoso3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnnMarie Cogdill / Jill Rayburn vs Patty Short / Heidi McKeever1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Creech vs Heike Schmid7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTiffani Johnson / Katie Schleider vs Jane Lacey / Esther Davis6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ashley Creech
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Katie Schleider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Anna Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Tiffani Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Jill Rayburn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Tracy Clayton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Gena Jacobsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Andrea Nicholas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ashley Wacasey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Candice Weinstein
published 3.5
3.17
Heather Nagy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
AnnMarie Cogdill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Rory Autry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Becky Martancik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kari Harrison
published
Lauren Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Bvunzawabaya
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Schleider + Tiffani Johnson404 matchesnot enough data
Jill Rayburn + Andrea Nicholas213 matchesnot enough data
Becky Martancik + Meghan Bvunzawabaya123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Creech
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Katie Schleider
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Anna Davenport
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Tiffani Johnson
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Jill Rayburn
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Tracy Clayton
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gena Jacobsen
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Nicholas
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ashley Wacasey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Candice Weinstein
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Heather Nagy
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
AnnMarie Cogdill
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Rory Autry
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Becky Martancik
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
Kari Harrison
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Stewart
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Bvunzawabaya
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.