Teams

Liberty Park-Lombardi/Webster

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.28 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-02vs Sports Mall Baseline BabesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Heidi Chytraus vs Nicole Reese / Karen Wilson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Heidi Chytraus vs Jessica Larson / Jennifer Davies6-7, 3-6
2026-04-14vs SLTHC Spring ChicksWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeidi Chytraus / Jeanette Shepard vs Marilee Cracroft / Elizabeth Harris-Johnson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jeanette Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.35
Bessy Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.27
Robin Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Heidi Chytraus
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ann Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Kelly Webster
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Jenni Guynn
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.10
Maria Lombardi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Chelsea Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3
3.03
Caitlin Brewer
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Jennifer Sweat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
2.95
Annie Mortensen
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.84
Jessica Eckert
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Carrie Larsen
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Spencer + Annie Mortensen13267% games+12.5% vs expected
Maria Lombardi + Robin Simmons4169% games+10.6% vs expected
Heidi Chytraus + Jennifer Sweat4253% games+9.7% vs expected
Kelly Webster + Robin Simmons11263% games+8.0% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Robin Simmons10558% games+7.4% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Maria Lombardi5255% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Robin Simmons7062% games+6.4% vs expected
Ann Weaver + Kelly Webster8258% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Robin Simmons
189W–90L career · 15 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heidi Chytraus
26W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ann Weaver
84W–59L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kelly Webster
197W–131L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Jenni Guynn
19W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Chelsea Spencer
69W–52L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Caitlin Brewer
15W–7L career · type S · 11 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jennifer Sweat
135W–130L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Annie Mortensen
89W–52L career · 23 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jessica Eckert
89W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Carrie Larsen
38W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.