Teams

Strung Out

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.57 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-14vs Queens of the CourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlly Stahl / Loretta Sevier vs Jamaine Chisholm / Jennifer Floyd6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHannah Stahl vs Angel Amponsah6-2, 6-2
2025-06-08vs GPSLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Collier / Ally Stahl vs Leah Noonan / Kelley Regan3-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesGrete Bravo / Lily Riedel vs Kelley Cantrell / Rachel Martinez0-6, 4-6
2025-06-01vs Lady TitansLost 01
L#1 DoublesLoretta Sevier / Ally Stahl vs Alison Bailey / Simone Feldman3-6, 3-3
2025-05-17vs Future TitansWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoretta Sevier / Ally Stahl vs Kathy Crowley / PAULA SMITH6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGrete Bravo / Emma Shine vs Cecilia Jones / Lisa Stock-Reusch6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLora Bacanskas / Jennifer Beekman vs Marion Dearth / Tamara Lindquist6-0, 6-1
2025-04-27vs Lady TitansLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Collier / Ally Stahl vs Jennifer Holliday / Serena Ninomiya0-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs Queens of the CourtLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlly Stahl / Loretta Sevier vs Brita Robinson / Carolyn Greis4-6, 5-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Beekman vs Lori Brathwaite1-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesGrete Bravo / Lora Bacanskas vs Jessica Bynum / Dannielle Freeman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Hannah Stahl
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.52
Emma Shine
published 4.5
4.28
Lily Riedel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Maria Maebius
published
4.16
Loretta Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Grete Bravo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Lora Bacanskas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
4.11
Ally Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Jennifer Collier
published
4.07
Jennifer Beets
published
4.00
Clarissa Duma
published 4.5
3.96
Jennifer Beekman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.88
Tracey Dickens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Coleman + Emma Shine5260% games+8.9% vs expected
Ally Stahl + Loretta Sevier11559% games+1.9% vs expected
Jennifer Collier + Ally Stahl4253% games+0.0% vs expected
Lily Riedel + Grete Bravo10456% games−2.7% vs expected
Ally Stahl + Lora Bacanskas3352% games−2.9% vs expected
Jennifer Beekman + Maria Maebius2345% games−7.5% vs expected
Jennifer Beekman + Tracey Dickens134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Maebius + Clarissa Duma224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hannah Stahl
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.59
4.5
Emma Shine
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.52
4.5
Lily Riedel
154W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
Maria Maebius
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
Loretta Sevier
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Grete Bravo
70W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Lora Bacanskas
54W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
Jessica Coleman
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Ally Stahl
35W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.11
Jennifer Collier
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.10
Jennifer Beets
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Clarissa Duma
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Jennifer Beekman
6W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.96
Tracey Dickens
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.