← Teams

PBurgess

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-05vs AAshburnWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesAnnette Langefeld / Patricia Zorko vs Elizabeth Lyle / Vicki Fritsch6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Donna D'Orazio vs Ann Ashburn / Ann Pershke6-1, 6-3
2022-09-29vs MSpringfield55Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Patricia Zorko vs Marcia Springfield / Teresa Stone6-3, 6-0
2022-09-22vs AWillardCombo55+Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Buckner / Patricia Zorko vs Annette Tavernaro / Genny Igo6-2, 6-4
2022-09-08vs DWilliamsWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesJackie Evans / Patricia Zorko vs Leslie Mahan / Tina Parker6-2, 6-3
2022-08-25Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Donna D'Orazio vs Sarah Bell / Helen Norona6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Patricia Zorko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Karen Maus
published —
2.74
Gwen Hedgepeth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwen Hedgepeth + Patricia Zorko3–14 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patricia Zorko
40W–43L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
—
Karen Maus
10W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gwen Hedgepeth
148W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.