Teams

2 ACAC Lewis

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-06vs 14 Westwood HarperLost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Coleman vs Liza Joyner3-6, 2-6
2025-10-21vs 12 SCC Serve-vivors - WeisigerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Mary Knick2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Colleen Weisiger6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Coleman vs Christine Martine6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Alice McCollum7-6, 5-2
W#2 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Shelly Galles6-0, 6-2
2025-10-02vs 18 Willow Oaks MayerWon 10
W#2 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Melissa Jiulianti6-1, 6-4
2025-09-25vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Kayla Bosman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Charmaine Nerone
published 3.5
3.47
Sarah Estes
published
3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Kelly Mastin
published
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Lewis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charmaine Nerone
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Sarah Estes
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kelly Mastin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
172W–119L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.