Teams

JSlep (CTNC)

2024 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-15vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJane Johnsen / Joan Slep vs Rene Griffin / Jan Puckett6-2, 6-0
2024-04-08vs JHadley/JNomina (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Johnsen / Joan Slep vs Paula Hoogerland / Kimberly Godwin1-6, 6-7
2024-04-01vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDianne Petrosino / Melodie Ohaus vs Marla Figard / Patti Ratcliffe6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Toni Evans vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-18vs LO'Shea/Stover (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKate Blankenship / Melodie Ohaus vs Susan Stover / Susie McCraney6-2, 6-4
2024-03-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesJane Johnsen / Joan Slep vs Freida Schipman / Suzanne Pignetti7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-26vs MFigard (Matthews)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Kate Blankenship vs Sally Lowrance / Suzanne Roxburgh1-6, 0-6
2024-02-19vs CHobson (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesToni Evans / Gillian Murrell vs Karen Bowman / Nanette Murphy4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Linda Hindel
published
3.08
James More
published
3.07
Jane Johnsen
published
3.06
Karen Trigg
published
3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
2.99
Patty Kahle
published
2.95
Toni Evans
published
2.95
Joan Slep
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Gillian Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Dianne Petrosino
published 3
Patty Halvorsen
published
Wilma Pinter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.9% vs expected
Dianne Petrosino + Wilma Pinter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Hindel
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
James More
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jane Johnsen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Karen Trigg
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kate Blankenship
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Patty Kahle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Toni Evans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dianne Petrosino
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Patty Halvorsen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wilma Pinter
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.